Filing a FOIA Request with CBP

The Freedom of Information Act gives the public a legal mechanism to request access to records held by federal agencies, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Understanding how CBP processes these requests, what records are available, and where requests are likely to be denied helps requesters set realistic expectations and submit more effective submissions. This page covers the definition and scope of FOIA as it applies to CBP, the procedural mechanics, common use cases, and the decision criteria that determine whether records are released or withheld.

Definition and scope

The Freedom of Information Act, codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552, establishes a presumption of openness for federal agency records. Any person — regardless of citizenship or stated purpose — may submit a FOIA request to a federal agency. CBP, as a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), is fully subject to FOIA and maintains its own FOIA office that processes requests independently of other DHS components.

CBP holds a substantial and diverse record universe. Records include traveler entry data, inspection logs, trade enforcement actions, seizure records, personnel records, policy directives, training materials, and correspondence. The scope of requestable records extends to any document — regardless of format — that was created or obtained by CBP in the course of its official functions. Electronic records, photographs, audio recordings, and databases all fall within FOIA's reach, subject to applicable exemptions.

Nine statutory exemptions allow agencies to withhold records or portions of records. Under CBP's administration of FOIA, the most commonly invoked exemptions are Exemption 7(E), which protects law enforcement techniques and procedures from disclosure when exposure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, and Exemption 6, which shields personal privacy interests. Detailed information about CBP's enforcement authority and legal powers helps contextualize why certain operational records are routinely withheld under these provisions.

How it works

FOIA requests directed to CBP follow a defined procedural path. The CBP FOIA Office, located within the agency's Office of Privacy and Diversity, serves as the central intake point for most requests, though certain categories — such as personnel records — may be routed to specific program offices.

A properly submitted request must:

  1. Be in writing, addressed to the CBP FOIA Office at the designated mailing address or submitted through the DHS FOIA portal at foiaonline.gov.
  2. Reasonably describe the records sought with sufficient specificity that a trained employee can locate them with a reasonable effort.
  3. State the requester's willingness to pay applicable fees, or include a fee waiver request with supporting justification.
  4. Include the requester's name and a mailing or email address for correspondence.

CBP is obligated under statute to respond within 20 business days of receipt. Complex or voluminous requests may be placed in a separate processing queue, and CBP — like all federal agencies — maintains a multi-track processing system that separates simple, complex, and expedited requests. Expedited processing is available when the requester can demonstrate a compelling need, such as an imminent threat to life or an urgent media interest in the subject matter.

Fee categories are determined by requester classification. Commercial-use requesters pay search, duplication, and review fees. Educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, and news media representatives pay duplication fees only, with the first 100 pages free. All other requesters receive the first 2 hours of search and the first 100 pages of duplication at no charge (5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(A)).

When CBP issues a final determination, it either produces responsive records (in full or with redactions), issues a Glomar response (neither confirming nor denying records exist), or issues a full denial. Any denial must cite the specific exemption(s) relied upon and inform the requester of the right to administratively appeal the decision to the DHS Office of General Counsel within 90 days. The CBP administrative appeals process page covers the appeal mechanism in greater detail.

Common scenarios

FOIA requests directed to CBP arise across a predictable set of use cases:

Travelers seeking their own entry records. Individuals who have been subject to secondary inspection or who want documentation of their own travel history frequently file FOIA requests. These requests often produce Arriving Passenger Inspection Records (Form I-213 is associated with immigration, but CBP maintains its own inspection databases). The CBP secondary inspection process page explains what records are generated during that encounter.

Attorneys and immigration practitioners. Legal representatives regularly request inspection records, encounter reports, and enforcement actions on behalf of clients. These requests are subject to Privacy Act overlay when the subject is a U.S. person, meaning the requester must provide a Privacy Act authorization signed by the subject.

Journalists and researchers. Reporters investigating trade enforcement patterns, CBP statistics and data, or civil rights incidents file FOIA requests for aggregate data, policy directives, and internal communications. These requesters may qualify for news media fee status if affiliated with a recognized media entity engaged in disseminating information to the public.

Importers and trade compliance professionals. Businesses involved in customs disputes may request records related to seizures, penalty notices, or CBP trade enforcement actions. Importers seeking information about classification rulings or binding rulings already published through CBP's CROSS database may find that the FOIA process is unnecessary for publicly available determinations.

Civil rights investigations. Complaints about CBP officer conduct, including allegations filed through CBP civil rights and complaints channels, may generate records that the complainant later seeks through FOIA.

Decision boundaries

Not all CBP records are releasable, and understanding the boundary conditions prevents wasted effort and sets appropriate expectations.

Releasable vs. withheld: a structural contrast. Records documenting completed, publicly acknowledged enforcement actions — such as a resolved seizure where the agency has issued a press release — are generally more releasable than records describing ongoing investigations, undercover techniques, or surveillance system specifications. CBP technology and surveillance infrastructure details are frequently withheld under Exemption 7(E) because disclosure could reveal detection thresholds or system limitations exploitable by bad actors.

Third-party records. A requester cannot obtain another individual's records without that person's written consent or proof of death. CBP will apply Exemption 6 and, where applicable, Exemption 7(C) to protect personal information about third parties named in responsive records.

Classified information. Records classified under Executive Order authority are exempt under Exemption 1 and cannot be released through the standard FOIA process. Requests for declassification are handled through a separate mandatory declassification review mechanism.

Fee waivers. A fee waiver is granted when the requester demonstrates that disclosure is in the public interest and that any commercial benefit to the requester is not the primary interest served. Blanket assertions of public interest without specificity are routinely denied. The requester must show how the specific records — not the general subject matter — contribute to public understanding of CBP operations.

The cbpauthority.com home page provides an orientation to CBP's structure, authorities, and operations that can help requesters frame their requests with sufficient specificity to facilitate efficient processing.